Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

The influence of social media on the treatment and psychosocial of acne vulgaris patient

  • Kristin Stephanie ,
  • Nelva Karmila Jusuf ,
  • Imam Budi Putra ,

Abstract

Introduction: Many social media platforms are available today that can facilitate social interaction and potentially affect health behavior. Social media can potentially serve as a source of information about how to treat acne. They can also be a tool to compare and raise dissatisfaction with their body image. Acne is a skin condition that primarily affects the face and can lead to significant psychosocial effects.

Methods: This study was a descriptive observational study with a cross-sectional design that included 50 subjects with acne vulgaris according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Basic data were recorded, including age, gender, education and job. Social media usage data were recorded, including actively used social media platforms and duration of use. Acne vulgaris treatment used by the subject based on information obtained from social media was recorded. Psychosocial was assessed using Acne-QoL-INA and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale questionnaire.

Result: In this study, acne vulgaris was more common in women and the 18-25 age group, where most subjects had higher education and student group. Instagram was the social media used daily by most acne vulgaris patients. Instagram was also the most used social media to access regarding therapy for acne vulgaris and was mostly used 1 hour per day. The subject used skin care to treat their acne, followed by topical agents and practicing instruction to heal acne. The influence of social media on the quality of life showed the lowest score range (0-10) on self-perception, role-social and role-emotional domain, on the acne symptoms domain was in the middle score range (11-20). Social media's influence on self-esteem shows 6% on low self-esteem, followed by 94% in the normal score range.

Conclusion: Using social media could encourage patients with acne to seek self-medication, mostly use skincare and have a psychosocial impact on patient's quality of life.

References

  1. Goh C, Cheng C, Agak G, Zanglein A, Graber E, Thiboutot D, et al. Acne vulgaris. In: Kang S, Amagai M, Bruckner A, Enk A, Margolis D, McMichael A, et al., editors. Fitzpatricks’ Dermatology in General Medicine. 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Companies; 2019. p. 1391–412.
  2. Griffith C, Creamer D, Ingram J, Simpson R. Rooks Textbook of Dermatology. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell; 2022. 503–521 p.
  3. Tuchayi SM, Makrantonaki E, Ganceviciene R, Dessinioti C, Feldman SR, Zouboulis CC. Acne vulgaris. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2015;1(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.29
  4. Mawardi P, Ardiani I, Primisawitri PP, Nareswari A. Dual role of Cutibacterium acnes in acne vulgaris pathophysiology. Bali Med J. 2021;10(2):486–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i2.2358
  5. Eram H, Shetty VH, Goel S, Babu AM. Quality of life in patients with acne vulgaris in a tertiary care centre: a cross sectional study. Int J Res Dermatology. 2019;5(2):406. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.intjresdermatol20191770
  6. Smailhodzic E, Hooijsma W, Boonstra A, Langley DJ. Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):442. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27562728
  7. Dellavalle R, Laughter M, Zangara T, Maymone MC, Rundle C, Dunnick C, et al. Social media use in dermatology. Dermatologica Sin. 2020;38(1):28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ds.ds_43_19
  8. Yousaf A, Hagen R, Delaney E, Davis S, Zinn Z. The influence of social media on acne treatment: A cross-sectional survey. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020/01/15. 2020;37(2):301–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31944359
  9. Bryant A. The Effect of Social Media on the Physical, Social Emotional, and Cognitive Development of Adolescents. 2018.
  10. Marpaung SC, Jusuf NK, Putra IB. Comparison of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum level in inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne vulgaris. Bali Med J. 2021;10(2):659–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i2.2438
  11. Rangkuti ADP, Jusuf NK, Putra IB. Comparison between the diagnosis of acne vulgaris by teledermatology and face-to-face consultations. Bali Med J. 2021;10(3):1037–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i3.2792
  12. Obermann M, Holle D. Faculty Opinions recommendation of Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. [Internet]. Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature. Faculty Opinions Ltd; 2016. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.719894686.793525441
  13. Heng AHS, Chew FT. Systematic review of the epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5754. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32238884
  14. Jusuf N, Putra I, Sari L. Differences of Microbiomes Found in Non-Inflammatory and Inflammatory Lesions of Acne Vulgaris. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020;13:773–80.
  15. Indramaya D. Kualitas Hidup Pasien Dewasa Muda dengan Akne Vulgaris Derajat Sedang di Indonesia. Berk Ilmu Kesehat Kulit Kelamin. 2019;31(3):210–5.
  16. Griffis HM, Kilaru AS, Werner RM, Asch DA, Hershey JC, Hill S, et al. Use of social media across US hospitals: descriptive analysis of adoption and utilization. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(11):e264–e264. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25431831
  17. Wibawa I, Winaya K. Karakteristik Penderita Acne Vulgaris di Rumah Sakit Umum (RSU) Indera Denpasar Periode 2014-2015. E J Med Udayana. 2019;8(11):4.
  18. Tankovska H. Daily active users of Instagram Stories 2019 [Internet]. Statista. 2021. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/730315/instagram-stories-dau/.
  19. Kaliyadan F, Alsultan H, Alsaqer H. The effect of social media on treatment options for acne vulgaris. Int J Med Dev Ctries. 2021;140–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.24911/ijmdc.51-1605689866
  20. Nguyen SH, Vu GT, Nguyen LH, Nguyen CT, Le THT, Tran TH, et al. Understanding Social Media Use and Engagement Among Dermatology Patients to Inform Dermatological Prevention and Care in Vietnam: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Dermatology. 2020;3(1):e13424. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13424
  21. Vilar GN, Santos LA dos, Sobral Filho JF. Quality of life, self-esteem and psychosocial factors in adolescents with acne vulgaris. An Bras Dermatol. 2015;90(5):622–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26560206
  22. Nazaya M, Praharsini I, Rusyati L. Profil gangguan kualitas hidup akibat akne vulgaris pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Udayana tahun 2015. E J Med Udayana. 2018;7(8):1–5.
  23. Kamamoto C de SL, Hassun KM, Bagatin E, Tomimori J. Acne-specific quality of life questionnaire (Acne-QoL): translation, cultural adaptation and validation into Brazilian-Portuguese language. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89(1):83–90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24626652
  24. Özkesici Kurt B. Comparison of the psychosocial impact of acne in adolescents and adults; body satisfaction, self‐esteem, and quality of life. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;21(2):836–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14151
  25. Hosthota A, Bondade S, Basavaraja V. Impact of Acne Vulgaris on Quality of Life and Self-esteem. Cutis. 2016;98:121–4.

How to Cite

Kristin Stephanie, Nelva Karmila Jusuf, & Imam Budi Putra. (2023). The influence of social media on the treatment and psychosocial of acne vulgaris patient. Bali Medical Journal, 12(2), 1645–1649. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i2.4076

HTML
38

Total
23

Share

Search Panel

Kristin Stephanie
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Nelva Karmila Jusuf
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Imam Budi Putra
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal