ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The quality of life in the treatment of maxillofacial fractures using open reduction: A prospective study

Nyoman Ayu Anggayanti , Endang Sjamsudin, Tantry Maulina, Aulia Iskandarsyah

Nyoman Ayu Anggayanti
Staff of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, School of Dentistry Medical Faculty Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia. Email: [email protected]

Endang Sjamsudin
Staff of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

Tantry Maulina
Staff of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

Aulia Iskandarsyah
Staff of Clinical psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
Online First: November 17, 2020 | Cite this Article
Ayu Anggayanti, N., Sjamsudin, E., Maulina, T., Iskandarsyah, A. 2020. The quality of life in the treatment of maxillofacial fractures using open reduction: A prospective study. Bali Medical Journal 9(3): 627-631. DOI:10.15562/bmj.v9i3.2055


Purpose: To assess the impact of open reduction on quality of life in patients with maxillofacial fractures.

Methods: A prospective study of 15 patients admitted to a general hospital in Bandung for maxillofacial trauma from October 2017 through February 2018 was conducted. Trauma severity was assessed using facial injury severity scale (FISS) score, while the quality of life was assessed using Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) -14 questionnaires at one day before surgery (T0) and 14 (T1) and 60 days (T2) after surgery.

Results: Male (3.92±1.89) and younger patients (3.89±1.69) had a greater mean FISS score than their respective counterparts. The most common areas involved in maxillofacial fractures were mandible body (80%) and dentoalveolar (46.67%). The overall quality of life was worse in younger patients as indicated with a higher mean OHIP-14 score. There was a disparity in the domain of interest where younger patients (17-30 years) had more concern over psychological discomfort, whereas older patients (31-50 years) were more concerned about physical disability. Both qualitative and quantitative improvement in quality of life was observed in the follow-up period. Consistent and statistically significant improvement in mean OHIP-14 score before intervention (20.80±5.94), 14 days post-intervention (17.93±4.68), and 60 days post-intervention (14.67±3.42) was observed.

Conclusion: Open surgery approach yielded a good outcome in quality of life improvement. Further study on demographic factors, timing, and quality of life domain affected in maxillofacial fractures is recommended.

References

Jose A, Nagori SA, Agarwal B, Bhutia O, Roychoudhury A. Management of maxillofacial trauma in emergency: An update of challenges and controversies. J Emergencies, Trauma Shock. 2016;9(2):73–80.

Parashar A, Sharma RK. Unfavourable outcomes in maxillofacial injuries: How to avoid and manage. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013;46(2):221–34.

Arslan ED, Solakoglu AG, Komut E, Kavalci C, Yilmaz F, Karakilic E, et al. Assessment of maxillofacial trauma in emergency department. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):13.

Lalloo R, Lucchesi LR, Bisignano C, Castle CD, Dingels Z V., Fox JT, et al. Epidemiology of facial fractures: Incidence, prevalence and years lived with disability estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Inj Prev. 2019;26(Suppl 1):i27.

Ochs MW, Tucker MR. Management of facial fractures. In: Peterson JL, editor. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6th ed. Mosby; 2014. p. 491–517.

Zoghbi Y, Gerth DJ, Tashiro J, Lee A, Thaller SR. Open versus closed reduction of maxillary fractures: Complications and resource utilization. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(7):1797–802. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28834837/

Sahni V. Psychological impact of facial trauma. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2018;11(1):015–20.

Sikora M, Chlubek M, Grochans E, Jurczak A, Safranow K, Chlubek D. Analysis of factors affecting quality of life in patients treated for maxillofacial fractures. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(1).

Setia MS. Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61(3):261–4.

Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121–6.

Hupp JR, Ellis E, Tucker MR. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2014. 491–517 p.

Bagheri SC, Dierks EJ, Kademani D, Holmgren E, Bell RB, Hommer L, et al. Application of a facial injury severity scale in craniomaxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(3):408–14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16487802/

Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25(4):284–90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9332805/

Conforte JJ, Alves CP, Sánchez M del PR, Ponzoni D. Impact of trauma and surgical treatment on the quality of life of patients with facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(5):575–81. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26723500/

Boffano P, Roccia F, Zavattero E, Dediol E, Uglešić V, Kovačič Ž, et al. European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) project: A multicentre and prospective study. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2015;43(1):62–70. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25457465/

Park K-P, Lim S-U, Kim J-H, Chun W-B, Shin D-W, Kim J-Y, et al. Fracture patterns in the maxillofacial region: a four-year retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;41(6):306.

Abhinav RP, Selvarasu K, Maheswari G, Taltia A. The patterns and etiology of maxillofacial trauma in South India. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019;9(1):114–7.

Zhou HH, Liu Q, Yang RT, Li Z, Li ZB. Maxillofacial fractures in women and men: A 10-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(11):2181–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26296597/

Zhou H, Lv K, Yang R, Li Z, Li Z. Mechanics in the production of mandibular fractures: A clinical, retrospective case-control study. PLoS One. 2016;11(2).

Pickrell BB, Serebrakian AT, Maricevich RS. Mandible fractures. Semin Plast Surg. 2017;31(2):100–7.

Kristaninta B, Kesuma AD. Evaluation of Facial Trauma Severity in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Using FISS Scoring System. J Plast Rekonstruksi. 2012;1(2):162–5.

Ramalingam S. Role of maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in determining the economic burden to maxillofacial trauma patients in India. J Int oral Heal JIOH. 2015;7(4):38–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25954069

Bocchialini G, Castellani A. Facial trauma: A retrospective study of 1262 patients. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019;9(1):135–9.

Islam S, Ahmed M, Walton GM, Dinan TG, Hoffman GR. The prevalence of psychological distress in a sample of facial trauma victims. A comparative cross-sectional study between UK and Australia. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2012;40(1):82–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21376610/

Gandjalikhan-Nassab SAH, Samieirad S, Vakil-Zadeh M, Habib-Aghahi R, Alsadat-Hashemipour M. Depression and anxiety disorders in a sample of facial trauma: A study from Iran. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21(4):e477–82.

Choudhury-Peters D, Dain V. Developing psychological services following facial trauma. BMJ Qual Improv Reports. 2016;5(1):u210402.w4210.

Slaven Lupi-Ferandin, Glumac S, Poljak N, Galic T, Ivkovic N, Brborovic O, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients after surgically treated midface fracture: A comparison with the croatian population norm. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:261–7.

Boljevic T, Vukcevic B, Pesic Z, Boljevic A. The quality of life of patients with surgically treated mandibular fractures and the relationship of the posttraumatic pain and trismus with the postoperative complications: A prospective study. Med. 2019;55(4).


No Supplementary Material available for this article.
Article Views      : 0
PDF Downloads : 0